On Sat, 17 Feb 2018, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > f(...,<+...__GFP_NOWARN...+>,...) > > Does this SmPL specification mean that the identifier can appear anywhere > within the function call parameters? Yes. > Would it be acceptable for a risk level of false positives to omit > the check for the really appropriate parameter position? Up to you to see what happens. julia _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
