On 20180426@09:25, Julia Lawall wrote: > On Thu, 26 Apr 2018, Michele Martone wrote: > > > Dear Prof. Lawall and Coccinelle team, > > > > I'm an enthusiastical, however still beginner use of Coccinelle. > > > > While running spatch 1.0.6 on a long OpenMP-enabled listing, I > > noticed that the presence of the C line: > > #pragma omp parallel for reduction(+:I) private(I) > > seems to prevent restructuring of the function containing it. > > If I simplify the pragma to something like > > #pragma omp parallel > > the problem disappears. > > > > Is there anything I can do to restructure large codes containing > > many of such similar lines ? > > > > In the attachment you find a test case and the output I experience. > > Thanks for the report. We can try to make the parsing of #pragmas more > flexible. > > julia
Dear Julia, thanks for the quick response! I'll be waiting for Coccinelle-sided developments then. May I ask what would you recommend now to circumvent this ? >From the SmPL v1.0.6 Grammar I am not aware of any way to e.g. ignore pragma lines as they were comments. So the best what comes to my mind is to: - comment #pragma lines - compute semantic patch - apply semantic patch - uncomment #pragma lines If there is any better solution, please let me know. Thanks, Michele _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
