Julia, The original patch I was looking at uses nested functions heavily and required modifying them. I will look for a different strategy on this patch and see if there is a better example elsewhere.
Mitchell > On May 5, 2018, at 2:16 PM, Julia Lawall <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Julia Lawall wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Mitchell Cuddie wrote: >> >>> Has anyone looked at supporting the blocks extension in Coccinelle? >>> https://clang.llvm.org/docs/BlockLanguageSpec.html >>> >>> There are a number of large projects like WebKit that could make use of >>> Coccinelle if it could parse the code. Any thoughts? >> >> Looking extremely quickly it looks like it could be possible. Do you just >> want the parser not to crash or to change this kind of code. Could you >> send a small typical example? > > Currently, Coccinelle doesn't support nested function definitions. > > Are these blocks used heavily in the code you are interested in? If > Coccinelle can't parse one function, it will just move on to the next one. > > julia _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
