> Thanks Himanshu for the suggestions.
> 
> However, I'm not sure to follow the discussion.  The original problem was
> that Coccinelle was removing a comment that should be preserved.  I think
> that this occurs because the line just below the comment is completely
> removed.  Coccinelle considers that the comment belongs with that line and
> if the line is removed the comment won't make much sense.
> 
> In Himanshu's solution, the code is just not transformed at all, so as a
> side effect the comment stays too.  Is that what is wanted in this case?

Yes, there is no transformation with my solution which I advised to
prevent comment removal(which i thought was useful).

My rule is more narrower approach than the regular ones which used
"expression" metavariable.

Rest upto Dominique to choose whatever suits better :)

-- 
Himanshu Jha
Undergraduate Student
Department of Electronics & Communication
Guru Tegh Bahadur Institute of Technology
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci

Reply via email to