On Wed, 10 Oct 2018, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > @dummy depends on rule1 || rule2 || rule3@
> >
> > I guess that the problem is that you have to give dummy a pattern
> > that will always match.
>
> Can a software extension make sense for the semantic patch language
> so that the specification of an always matching source code search
> pattern can be omitted?
>
> How do you think about an additional key word in the SmPL rule header?
I think that there are enough keywords already. Perhaps allowing no
pattern could be permitted, but the problem seems rare.
julia
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
