> Reviewed-by: Markus Elfring <markus.elfr...@web.de> I have got doubts that my code review comments qualify already for this tag. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=1f947a7a011fcceb14cb912f5481a53b18f1879a#n565
> Cc: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr I assume that Masahiro Yamada will also need to get explicitly informed for a possible patch integration. > v3->v2: > - reduction of a bit of redundant C code within SmPL search specifications. > - consider the message construction without using the extra Python variable > “msg” I find it nice that you would like to take this information into account. > + when != e4 = (T1)platform_get_drvdata(id) > +( > + Should a blank line be omitted at such a source code place? > + return > +( id > +| (T2)dev_get_drvdata(&id->dev) > +| (T3)platform_get_drvdata(id) > +); It seems that you would like to express a different coding style. Would anybody like to reconsider the position once more for semicolons in nested disjunctions for such a SmPL search specification? > +coccilib.report.print_report(p2[0], "ERROR: missing put_device; > of_find_device_by_node on line " + p1[0].line + " and return without > releasing.") Your willingness for such a rearrangement is interesting. How do you think about to move the long message parameter to a subsequent line? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
