It seem to match. Running the following little patch/script
@@
type T;
identifier fn;
@@
- T fn(
+ void fn(T *ret,
...) {...}
generates, for example, the following diff
-int foo(void) {
+void foo(int *ret, void) {
return 0;
}
Any idea what the best way to prevent this would be?
OK, sorry, I didn't notice that it was only ... in the matching part. I
think you could just put a dummy parameter:
@@
type T,T1;
identifier fn,i;
@@
- T fn(
+ void fn(T *ret,
T1 i, ...) {...}
That should match cases with only one parameter, even though the ,
doesn't match anything.
julia
Thank you in advance!
Nicolas
P.S.: Is there a community where I can ask such questions without
bothering people personally?
Yes, there is a mailing list., You should see this in the contact
link at coccinelle.lip6.fr. You should join the mailing list so I
don't have to approve the posts.
Thank you, I've subscribed and added the list to this thread
Nicolas
julia
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
