>> A return statement was specified with a known value for three branches >> of a SmPL disjunction. >> Reduce duplicate SmPL code there by using another disjunction for >> these return values. … > NACK. The goak is not to squeeze the most information into the fewest > number of characters.
Can you accept any other formatting for the adjusted SmPL code? > The rule was fine as it was. Can different run time characteristics become relevant here? Regards, Markus
