On Mon, 20 May 2019, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > A semantic patch has no access to comments. The only thing I can see to > > do is to use python to interact with some external tools. For example, > > you could write some code to collect the comments in a file and the lines > > on which they occur, and then get the comment that most closely precedes > > the start of the function. > > How dangerous is missing of_node_put? AFAICT it will only result into > very small, one-time memory leak, right? > > Could we make sure these patches are _not_ going to stable? Leaking > few bytes once per boot is not really a serious bug. Agreed. Just tell Sasha. julia > Pavel > > -- > (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek > (cesky, pictures) > http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html >
- Re: Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node_put Julia Lawall
- Re: Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node_put Markus Elfring
- Re: Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node_put Pavel Machek
- Re: Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node... Julia Lawall
- Re: [Cocci] Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing... Julia Lawall
- Re: Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_... Sasha Levin
- Re: [Cocci] Coccinelle: semantic patch for... Julia Lawall
- Re: Coccinelle: semantic patch for mi... Markus Elfring
- Re: Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node_put Markus Elfring
- Re: Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_node_put Markus Elfring
- Re: [Cocci] Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing... wen.yang99
- Re: Coccinelle: semantic patch for missing of_... Markus Elfring
- Re: [Cocci] Coccinelle: semantic patch for... wen.yang99
- Re: Coccinelle: semantic patch for mi... Markus Elfring
