>> How does your software decide which comment should be treated >> as simple text before or after an item? > > It takes all of the comments before (up to the preceding non comment > token if any) within and after (up to the following non comment token > if any).
I find that this information can be confusing. Will the desired text relationships become clearer? > I'm not sure what happens at the end of a function. Interesting special case. > I suspect that the end of a function is the end. The comments that > are before the start of the next function are not considered to be after > the function that precedes them. Will such details become relevant also for the SmPL manual? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
