> The when any's allow any possible match. There are three calls to foo so > three possible matches.
Can my software interpretation of unexpected code repetition be adjusted also by moving the code “\(foo@c3();\&S@c4\)” into another SmPL rule? Can it make sense to split the OCaml script rule then too? Did I expect a bit too much here to filter the source code for existing comments (instead of accepting also the usual possibility for omitted comments)? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
