>> Two function calls were combined in this function implementation.
>> Inline corresponding code so that extra error checks can be avoided here.
>
> I don't see any point to this at all.

Would you like to take another look at corresponding design options?

How do you think about to check run time characteristics any more?


> By inlining the code, you have created a clone,
> which will introduce extra work to maintain in the future.

Would you find the shown software transformation acceptable
if a C compiler will be able to generate a similar code structure?

Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci

Reply via email to