> - for (I = TAILQ_FIRST(H); I != NULL; I = TAILQ_NEXT(I, N)) S > + TAILQ_FOREACH(I, H, N) S
Can it make sense to avoid touching the (compound) statement at the end so that only the loop header would be replaced? -for (I = TAILQ_FIRST(H); I != NULL; I = TAILQ_NEXT(I, N)) +TAILQ_FOREACH(I, H, N) S Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
