On Sun, 29 Sep 2019, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Maybe the problem would be solved by putting virtual report at the top of > > the rule. > > I assume that support for the operation mode “patch” can eventually be > considered. > Coccicheck requires that all rules support the report mode. julia > > > But it might still fail because nothing can happen without a value > > for the virtual metavariable ns. > > I imagine that the safe handling of this command line input parameter > will trigger further software development concerns. > > > > Should the coccinelle directory be only for things that work with make > > coccicheck, > > I hope not. > > But it seems that a filter command expressed such a restriction so far. > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/scripts/coccicheck?id=02dc96ef6c25f990452c114c59d75c368a1f4c8f#n257 > > Is this place an update candidate now? > > > > or for all Coccinelle scripts? > > I would prefer file storage selections in this direction. > How do you think about to improve the software taxonomy accordingly? > > Regards, > Markus >
