On Fri, 11 Oct 2019, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > And what is the questionable source code place?
>
> I find implementation details occasionally questionable where checks for
> variables
> which provide a stored function return value are missing.
> The possibility remains that also your search pattern suggestion will point
> update candidates out at other places than the implementation of the mentioned
> function “imx_pd_bind”.
Blah, blah, blah. So many words. So little information.
What is the name of the file and the line number at which you get a result
that you find inacceptable with my rule?
If you can't answer that simple question, I'm not going to discuss this
further.
julia
>
> How do you think about the following SmPL script variant?
>
> @display@
> expression x, y;
> identifier f, md;
> @@
> *(x)->md = kmemdup(...);
> ... when != (x)->md
> (((x)->md)->f
> |f(..., <+... x ...+>, ...)
> |(y = x)
> )
>
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
