> so, that suggestion works the same as my previous shared statement.
I suggest to take another look at presented implementation details.
> but, only for calls like: *my_printf("%s", h1.name);*,
I limited my suggestion intentionally.
> not for *my_printf("%d here also, tt=%s | %s and %m\n", id, h2->name,
> h2->name, s2);*
Such a function call is using more parameters. Would you get into
the mood then to specify additional metavariables in SmPL script variants?
> so, I am not sure if Coccinelle is able to do that.
I hope that more useful data processing for format strings will become
supported by the semantic patch language.
Yesterday an information was given that another functionality is also
work in progress.
> I've read all samples available in the Kernel and Coccinelle repo's
I find such information interesting and promising.
> and I didn't see any similar case.
This observation can be fine.
How often do you fiddle with source code transformations around
format strings?
> I think that if Julia Lawall don't know, No one in the world knows.
Such an impression can occur. - But I would like to point further
possibilities out for desired knowledge distribution.
* Would you like to contact any more related developers?
* How do you think about to improve your own expertise
(around the discussed free software) in any ways?
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
