On Mon, 6 Jan 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > The only short term suggestion I have is the following:
>
> I wonder about the specification of two statement variables here.
>
>
> Under which circumstances can a transformation approach (like the following)
> work as desired?
>
> @addition@
> identifier action;
> statement s;
> @@
> <+...
> action(...)
> +;
> s
> ...+>
Currently none. The SmPL language doesn't support statements that look
like function calls but have no following ;
julia
>
> elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/Probe> spatch --parse-cocci
> add_semicolon_behind_call1.cocci
> init_defs_builtins: /usr/local/bin/../lib/coccinelle/standard.h
> minus: parse error:
> File "add_semicolon_behind_call1.cocci", line 8, column 1, charpos = 70
> around = 's',
> whole content = s
>
>
> How will further improvements be achieved for data processing around macro
> calls?
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
