On Fri, 10 Jan 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > +@initialize:python@
> …
> > +def construct_warnings(str, suggested_fun):
>
> This function will be used only for the operation modes “org” and “report”.
> Thus I suggest to replace the specification “initialize” by a corresponding
> dependency
> which is already applied for the SmPL rule “r”.
>
>
> Can subsequent SmPL disjunctions become more succinct?
>
>
> The passing of function name variants contains a bit of duplicate Python code.
> Will a feature request like “Support for SmPL rule groups” become more
> interesting
> for the shown use case?
> https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/issues/164
The code is fine as it is in these respects.
julia
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
