On Tue, 21 Jan 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > If <typedef> is a known typedef (such as u8 or *_t) then label <macro>
> > as a CppMacro. Subsequent cases will label <typedef> correctly as a
> > typedef ident.
> >
> > Also add bool to the list of known typedefs so that cases of
>
> Can a wording like the following be nicer for such a change description?
>
> Label <macro> as a CppMacro if <typedef> is a known type definition
> (such as u8 or *_t).
> Subsequent cases will label <typedef> correctly as a type definition
> identifier.
Actually, there is a piece of important information that is missing in
both of these messages. It would be nice to say "Subsequent cases will
continue to label...".
julia
>
> Add bool also to the list of known type definition identifiers so that
> cases of
>
>
> Regards,
> Markus
> _______________________________________________
> Cocci mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
>
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
