>> @display@ >> expression X; >> identifier I; >> @@ >> *auto I = X(...); … > I think it expects a type as well. I don't know if that is a reasonable > assumption in C or in C++.
How do you think about to interpret such a variable definition in the way that the omission of an other data type specification would result into the usage of “int”? Under which circumstances will the handling of “placeholder type specifiers” become relevant finally? https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/auto Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
