…
> +++ b/parsing_c/pretty_print_c.ml
> @@ -804,11 +804,12 @@ and pp_string_format (e,ii) =
>               (FunctionType (return=void, params=int i) *)
>            (*WRONG I THINK, use left & right function *)
>            (* bug: pp_type_with_ident_rest None t;      print_ident ident *)
> +          pp_type_left t;
>            pr_elem i;
>            iiqu +> List.iter pr_elem; (* le const est forcement apres le '*' 
> *)
>            if iiqu <> [] || get_comments_after i <> []
>            then pr_space();
> -          pp_type_with_ident_rest ident t attrs Ast_c.noattr;
> +          print_ident ident
>
>        (* ugly special case ... todo? maybe sufficient in practice *)
>        | (ParenType ttop, [i1;i2]) ->

Are the source code comments still appropriate for this patch hunk?

Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci

Reply via email to