On Thu, 7 May 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I have tried further script variants out for the semantic patch language
> (according to the software combination “Coccinelle 1.0.8-00087-g7cf2c23e”).
>
> Source code example:
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> // deleted part
> static int sca3000_read_data(struct sca3000_state *st,
>                            u8 reg_address_high,
>                            u8 *rx,
>                            int len)
> {
>       int ret;
>       struct spi_transfer xfer[2] = {
>               {
>                       .len = 1,
>                       .tx_buf = st->tx,
>               }, {
>                       .len = len,
>                       .rx_buf = rx,
>               }
>       };
> // deleted part
>       ret = spi_sync_transfer(st->us, xfer, ARRAY_SIZE(xfer));
>       if (ret) {
>               dev_err(get_device(&st->us->dev), "problem reading register");
>               return ret;
>       }
>
>       return 0;
> }
> // deleted part
>
>
> See also:
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1236743/
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/[email protected]/
>
>
> The following search approach points a questionable source code place out
> as expected.
>
> @display@
> @@
> (dev_err
> |dev_info
> )       (
> *        get_device(...),
>          ...
>         )
>
>
> elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/janitor> spatch 
> show_get_device_as_message_parameter2.cocci 
> ../Probe/sca3000-excerpt-20200505.c
> …
> @@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ static int sca3000_read_data(struct sca3
>  // deleted part
>       ret = spi_sync_transfer(st->us, xfer, ARRAY_SIZE(xfer));
>       if (ret) {
> -             dev_err(get_device(&st->us->dev), "problem reading register");
>               return ret;
>       }
>
>
> But I do not get the same output for the following SmPL script.
>
> @display@
> @@
> (dev_err
> |dev_info
> )       (
> *        <+... get_device(...) ...+>
>         )
>
>
> Is such a test result worth for further software development considerations?

No.

<+... ...+> as an expression matches a single expression.  The function
has multiple arguments.

julia

> Does the application of the SmPL nest construct need any more clarification?
> https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/issues/114
>
> Regards,
> Markus
> _______________________________________________
> Cocci mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
>
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci

Reply via email to