>> @r depends on !patch@
>> // It doesn't work. Is it normal?
>> //position p: script:python() { matches.extend(p); relevant(p) };
>
> "Doesn't work" means you get a parse error? The parser of the code inside
> the {} is pretty fragile. Perhaps this could be improved somewhat, but it
> is limited by the fact that Coccinelle doesn't know how to parse python
> properly.
It prints "hd" and exits.
> This seems entirely reasonable. You can collect the places that are
> matched in a variable declared in the initialize, and then look at that
> variable in the finalize.
I need a list of all files spatch tries to process. A list of files in which
spatch finds some matches is not enough. Otherwise the approach will incorrectly
work when cocci script runs on a subset of kernel files, e.g.,
make coccicheck M=drivers/net
Thanks,
Denis
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
