> ( > * size = E1 * E2;@p > | > * size = E1 * E2 * E3;@p > | > * size = E1 * E2 + E3;@p > )
I suggest to reconsider also the order of elements for such a SmPL disjunction. Can a computation like “E2 * E3” also be matched by the expression metavariable “E2” alone? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
