>> @replacement@ >> identifier array, instance, size; >> type T; >> @@ >> ( >> -sizeof(T) >> | >> -sizeof(*instance->array) >> ) >> * >> +flex_array_size(instance, array, >> instance->size >> + ) > > This semantic patch will fail if the sizeof(T) option is matched, becuse > then it won't be able to create the + code, since it won't know what array > should be.
Will this information trigger further consequences for the clarification of the topic “[RFC PATCH] coccinelle: api: add flex_array_size.cocci script”? https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/20200828163134.496386-1-efre...@linux.com/ https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2020-August/008169.html Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
