> Implement a name cache and includes dependency graph to optimize > performance for recursive parsing of header files.
Can such information trigger any more evolution besides the contributed OCaml source code? > The names of the above are stored in a "name cache", i.e. a hashtable > to map the name to the files it is declared in. How much does hashing matter here? > - A dependency graph is built to determine dependencies between all the > files in the codebase. Can such information indicate a need for its own programming interface? > - In the type annotation phase of the C subsystem, if a function call, > struct/union field or identifier is encountered, the type of which is > not known to the annoter, the name cache is checked for the name. Is there anything in common with symbol tables? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
