I'd like to add a statement after another within a preprocessor expression,
How do you think about to refer to a “#define directive”?
but spatch adds the line without an escape (backslash).
I imagine that we stumble on another target conflict here.
https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/issues/139
Do you really want to adjust a bit of text according to a preprocessing
definition?
#define X(a) x(a);
(I know the above is not technically correct but it's super common.)
I stumble on understanding difficulties for this information.
Would you like to clarify the knowledge about correctness a bit more?
@@
expression e;
@@
x(e);
+ y(e);
How should the scope be specified that a change should be performed
only for preprocessor code (replacement lists for your transformation approach)?
I can think of two solutions, if an expression is inside a
preprocessor statement: add a backslash before every newline, or skip
the newline.
Would you like to choose the preferred coding style for such an use case?
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
