Re: [Cocci] Checking the influence of an omitted semicolon on a code adjustment

[Julia Lawall]

On Sat, 28 Nov 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:

> >> I have shown a transformation example where a function parameter should be 
> >> replaced
> >> by a previous function call.
> >> Thus a semicolon should be intentionally be deleted.
> >
> > That makes no sense.
>
> This transformation part is working as expected (under constraints) already.
>
>
> > You can't have an expression directly following a statement.
> > Only statements follow other statements.
>
> This information is reasonable.
>
> Does the Coccinelle software insist on the specification of another semicolon
> in the SmPL script for the identification of an adjustable statement?

Yes

>
> Regards,
> Markus
>
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci