On Mon, 11 Jan 2021, Denis Efremov wrote:

>
>
> On 1/11/21 11:23 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Jan 2021, Denis Efremov wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Let's suppose I want to match otx_cpt_aead_cbc_aes_sha_setkey() function 
> >> from
> >> drivers/crypto/marvell/octeontx/otx_cptvf_algs.c file (linux kernel).
> >>
> >> My pattern:
> >> @exists@
> >> identifier rta, param, key, keylen;
> >> position p;
> >> @@
> >>
> >> otx_cpt_aead_cbc_aes_sha_setkey(...,
> >>    unsigned char *key, unsigned int keylen)
> >> {
> >>    ...
> >> *  if (RTA_PAYLOAD(rta) < sizeof(*param))@p
> >>            goto badkey;
> >>    ...
> >> *  key += RTA_ALIGN(rta->rta_len);
> >> *  keylen -= RTA_ALIGN(rta->rta_len);
> >>    ...
> >> }
> >>
> >> $ spatch --no-includes --include-headers --cocci-file test.cocci 
> >> drivers/crypto/marvell/octeontx/otx_cptvf_algs.c
> >> init_defs_builtins: /usr/lib64/coccinelle/standard.h
> >> minus: parse error:
> >>   File "test.cocci", line 13, column 9, charpos = 219
> >>   around = 'RTA_ALIGN',
> >>   whole content = *     key += RTA_ALIGN(rta->rta_len);
> >>
> >>
> >> What can I do to match RTA_ALIGN(...) lines?
> >
> > I don't understand the problem.  I took your rule and your command line,
> > and everything was fine.
>
> I use version:
> spatch version 1.0.8-gc1dbb4f-dirty compiled with OCaml version 4.11.1
> Flags passed to the configure script: --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu 
> --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= 
> --disable-dependency-tracking --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr 
> --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share 
> --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/libexec 
> --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/var/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man 
> --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-python=/usr/bin/python3 
> --with-menhir=/usr/bin/menhir
> OCaml scripting support: yes
> Python scripting support: yes
> Syntax of regular expressions: PCRE
>
> Maybe parsing error is fixed in new versions?

I can't imagine what would cause a parsing error here.  I don't see what
could be special about RTA_ALIGN.  Normally Coccinelle doesn't even know
that it is a macro.  Maybe you can try to simplify the semantic patch a
little bit and see if there is some change that causes the problem to
disappear?  Does the problem disappear if you use a name other than
RTA_ALIGN?

julia
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci

Reply via email to