The IRQF_ONESHOT should be present for threaded IRQ using default
primary handler.  However intetrupt of many child devices, e.g. children
of MFD, is nested thus the IRQF_ONESHOT is not needed.  The coccinelle
message about error misleads submitters and reviewers about the severity
of the issue, so make it a warning and mention possible false positive.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlow...@canonical.com>
---
 scripts/coccinelle/misc/irqf_oneshot.cocci | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/irqf_oneshot.cocci 
b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/irqf_oneshot.cocci
index 7b48287b3dc1..9b6f404d07f2 100644
--- a/scripts/coccinelle/misc/irqf_oneshot.cocci
+++ b/scripts/coccinelle/misc/irqf_oneshot.cocci
@@ -103,11 +103,11 @@ devm_request_threaded_irq@p(dev, irq, NULL, ...)
 @script:python depends on org@
 p << match.p;
 @@
-msg = "ERROR: Threaded IRQ with no primary handler requested without 
IRQF_ONESHOT"
+msg = "WARNING: Threaded IRQ with no primary handler requested without 
IRQF_ONESHOT (unless it is nested IRQ)"
 coccilib.org.print_todo(p[0],msg)
 
 @script:python depends on report@
 p << match.p;
 @@
-msg = "ERROR: Threaded IRQ with no primary handler requested without 
IRQF_ONESHOT"
+msg = "WARNING: Threaded IRQ with no primary handler requested without 
IRQF_ONESHOT (unless it is nested IRQ)"
 coccilib.report.print_report(p[0],msg)
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci

Reply via email to