On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Jeff LaMarche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, I agree... if this is a configuration parameter that he wants the > user to be able to set. Since he was talking about using preprocessor > directives, I made the assumption that this was not supposed to be > user-configurable for some reason. In hindsight, that was probably a stupid > assumption.
I don't think it's a stupid assumption on your part at all. Quite a reasonable one, actually. I *do* think it's a design flaw, however, to make this "thing that could easily change thereby breaking the application" dependent on a software update when it can *very easily* be made a user-configurable item. You could even hide the UI if you wanted to, or have a canned support response containing the command line "defaults write ..." 'fix' if the URL changes. That way, the users can fix for themselves while you compile and distribute (and notify of) the update. -- I.S. _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
