On Jun 24, 2015, at 4:09 PM, Rick Mann <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I guess I disagree: it's obvious in most cases. Again, I'm just arguing for
> the OPTION. You can always choose to use the parameter name if you wish.
You have the option. Given this signature:
func foo(intArg: Int, stringArg: String) -> Bool { ... }
add this code to call the function without named arguments.
func foo(intArg: Int, _ stringArg: String) -> Bool {
return foo(intArg, stringArg: stringArg)
}
Now you can call it either way.
I like that I do NOT have the ability to mix and match calling conventions
by accident which could possibly confuse code readers. Especially when I am
the code reader! If I really need the the option to do mix styles adding
code such as that above wouldn’t be an issue.
Marc
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]
