I think the trick with all these ideas is that IB will just remove the <…> when it good and well pleases and then you’re back to square one.
-Stevo Brock Owner Sunset Magicwerks, LLC www.sunsetmagicwerks.com @SunsetMagicwrks 818-478-9758 > On Dec 3, 2015, at 11:44 PM, Quincey Morris > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Dec 3, 2015, at 23:30 , Roland King <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: >> >> Quincey had one idea - but I don’t know how you @objcname a specialisation >> of a generic. > > Well, yes, that’s a good objection. > > It seems to me that the three things to try, if they haven’t been tried yet > are: > > 1. class: > Media_Tools.MediaItemViewController<Media_Tools.PhotoMediaItemView> > module: empty > > 2. class: MediaItemViewController<PhotoMediaItemView> > module: Media_Tools > > 3. class: MediaItemViewController< Media_Tools.PhotoMediaItemView> > module: Media_Tools > > It looks like Swift classes have a stringified name that Obj-C is supposed to > recognize, that includes an explicit “myModule.” prefix. My understanding is > that the module field in IB adds the module, but it may not do so for the > specialization. Whether the generic specialization is in the class name > string is anybody’s guess. > _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
