> On 13 Jan 2017, at 10:34 am, Quincey Morris > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Did I miss a change in clang that made the default “not nullable”?? I read > the above declaration as meaning that the nullability is *unspecified*, which > implies that nil is allowed.
NSObject.h (from which Sean was quoting) begins with NS_ASSUME_NONNULL_BEGIN which, to my understanding, makes everything in the file be non-nullable unless otherwise annotated. b _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
