[Sending again since I neglected to include the list in the first
reply. Tell me again why this list isn't configured with reply-to-all
by default?]
On Aug 7, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Ken Ferry wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Randall Meadows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pc.com> wrote:
On Aug 7, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Nate Weaver wrote:
I'd say just try the default options and see what happens. You
might also
look at -[NSWorkspace
performFileOperation:source:destination:files:tag:]
with NSWorkspaceRecycleOperation as the first argument.
Yes, that's actually what I started with, but that doesn't
(automatically)
take into account the volume that the document resides on and its
related
Trash directory. Which is what I'm hoping FSMoveObjectToTrash
gives me.
If something about NSWorkspace's behavior doesn't match the Finder,
please file a bug.
It's not that "NSWorkspace's behavior doesn't match the Finder", it's
that I have to do (lots of?) extra work to determine the correct
destination Trash directory, depending on the volume where the file
being moved to the "Trash" lives. Work that FSMoveObjectToTrashX
allegedly does for me, but there's the documentation conflict that
bothers me. Perhaps that's the real bug?
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
