On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Jonathan deWerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> I would make plugins of a different type: standard cocoa bundles (there are
> a handful of tutorials on google). This way, people could install and
> uninstall using the finder (a little known but helpful feature of the info
> box), you could use standard cocoa APIs, you wouldn't have to deal with the
> overhead of spawning a new process, and you could provide a template to get
> devs started. Then I'd just pass configuration info in a dictionary.


Okay. That looks like a much better solution (If only I had used it from the
beginning). It definitely looks worthwhile to look into, as I'm a newbie at
making plug-ins. Thank you.


> If that isn't an option, I would pass a bunch of --key value pairs to
> retain some semblance of standard-ness :)
>
> On Aug 6, 2008, at 4:33 PM, hac wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>> I'm developing an application to support third-party extensions that
>> filter
>> text. Each filter consists mainly of a property list and an executable.
>> The
>> idea is that the text of the current document goes into the executable
>> along
>> with settings specified in the property list (as arguments); text to
>> replace
>> the document text comes out as the standard output.
>>
>> Right now I am stuck trying to decide how I should pass both the document
>> text and the settings to the executable. I see three options:
>>
>>  1. Have the first argument be the document text, and the second an XML
>>  string containing the settings as key-value pairs.
>>  2. Have the first argument be the docucument text, the second a setting
>>  key, the third a setting value, the fourth a setting key, etc...
>>  3. Have the first argument be the docucument text, have each successive
>>  argument be a setting value, in an order specified in the property list
>> so
>>  as to determine the key for each.
>>
>> I can easily set up the application to support any of these methods. My
>> problem is that each one seems to have some inconveniences for the
>> developer
>> of the filter, and I would like to make this as convenient as possible for
>> anyone who makes a filter. Could someone tell me which method would be the
>> most appropriate?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected])

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to