sorry, you're correct.  i had an error in the code so it was wrongly
implemented.  it does indeed work with negative values.  thanks again.

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Graham Cox <graham....@bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> On 27/01/2010, at 9:24 AM, Graham Cox wrote:
>
>>
>> On 27/01/2010, at 9:18 AM, Chunk 1978 wrote:
>>
>>> i just realized that this formula doesn't work with negative numbers.
>>> for example:  shifting a pitch down one octave over a duration from
>>> 0.0 to -0.5, or panning a source with a duration from center at 0.0 to
>>> the left -1.0.
>>>
>>> any advice?
>>
>>
>> Yes it does. You must have made a mistake implementing it.
>
>
> I just realised why you think it doesn't. It's not the DURATION that needs to 
> be negative, it's the values. Time only ever progresses in one direction, as 
> far as we know, therefore the time values are always +ve. The value may 
> freely be negative, which after all is what you are controlling.
>
> --Graham
>
>
>
_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to