On Sep 8, 2010, at 10:21 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> The message in the 'if' ([theNumOne compare:theNumTwo]) is an invocation of
> [NSNumber compare:], not [NSDecimalNumber compare:]. It's not absolutely
> clear what is supposed to happen when the compare parameter is an instance of
> NSDecimalNumber. Yes, NSDecimalNumber is a subclass of NSNumber, but these
> are abstract classes. The actual objects are (typically) concrete subclasses
> of the abstract classes, such as NSCFNumber. It's possible that this muddies
> the waters enough that the mixed comparison doesn't work as you would expect.
>
> In any case, why not simply do the comparison between 'self' and
> '[NSDecimalNumber zero]'?
Sorry for the last reply - I had the wrong subject line. I have nailed down
that it seems that the BOOL is being returned as something other than char 1 ||
char 0 from the private framework where the category exists. The following
works though, I know it's bad to use NSInteger values instead of BOOL but at
this point I am at a dead end....
//=========== WORKS
-(BOOL)isLessThanZero
{
NSInteger theInteger = 0;
if ([[NSDecimalNumber zero] compare:self] == NSOrderedDescending)
{
theInteger = 1;
}
return theInteger;
}
--chris_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]
