Interesting. Your +setFoo: example, I’m assuming, sets a global int. What about objects? I’m assuming that if I declare a global NSArray pointer like so:
NSArray *foo = nil; and then have a +setFoo:(NSArray *)array method, that calling it with nil will be sufficient to clean up the array (that is, the ARC code will release the current array)? Jeff Kelley On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Dave Zarzycki <[email protected]> wrote: > The simplest and most ARC friendly way to implement the singleton pattern > is to switch from instance methods to class methods – because the class > itself is by definition a singleton. In other words: > > + (MyClass *)sharedInstance; > // and maybe override alloc/retain/release to enforce the singleton > pattern > - (int)foo; > - (void)setFoo:(int)val; > > …becomes simply: > > + (int)foo; > + (void)setFoo:(int)val; > > davez > > > On Aug 1, 2011, at 8:48 AM, Jeff Kelley wrote: > > > Is there a new recommended way to implement a singleton with ARC? I > remember > > hearing something about it, but I’m not sure what it was. > > > > Jeff Kelley > _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
