Karl, This is not on our todo list or any list that I know of. Please file a bug report if this enhancement request is interesting to you.
Thanks! :-) davez On Aug 2, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Karl Goiser wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Is that wishful thinking or a hint about the future? > :-) > > > All I have to say is: yes please!! > > > Regards, > > Karl > > > On 03/08/2011, at 5:43 AM, Greg Parker wrote: > >> On Aug 1, 2011, at 9:02 PM, Kyle Sluder wrote: >>> if we had class storage (which in practice would be no different from >>> static global variables except for scope), class methods would still >>> be appropriate for a different set of tasks. >> >> Not necessarily. Class variables could be defined differently from global >> variables. If a class variable were defined in the natural way, as an >> instance variable for the class instance described by the metaclass, then >> class variables would be inherited in the same way that instance variables >> are. A subclass object would have its own copy of its superclass's >> variables, just like a subclass instance object has its own copy of its >> superclass instance's variables. >> >> -- >> Greg Parker [email protected] Runtime Wrangler >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > > Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > > Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. > Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com > > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/zarzycki%40apple.com > > This email sent to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
