On Aug 8, 2011, at 06:24 PM, Sean McBride wrote: > On Sun, 7 Aug 2011 07:39:25 +0200, Martin Hewitson said: > >> Is there a know problem or limitation in naming relationships? I haven't >> come across this anywhere before. > > Well, you should not name properties with the same name as an NSObject or > NSMangedObject method name. ex: don't create a property named 'retain'.
But that's not what I did. I named an relationship with a lower-case version of an Entity name. The relationship points to a File entity, so calling the relationship 'file' seemed reasonable and rational to me. > If forget if there is a warning about this or not... if not, someone should > file a bug. :) Same here. I don't recall ever reading such a warning in the docs or any of the core data books and tutorials I've read. I'll wait awhile to see if anyone else remembers seeing this, then file a bug report. Martin > > -- > ____________________________________________________________ > Sean McBride, B. Eng [email protected] > Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com > Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Martin Hewitson Albert-Einstein-Institut Max-Planck-Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik und Universitaet Hannover Callinstr. 38, 30167 Hannover, Germany Tel: +49-511-762-17121, Fax: +49-511-762-5861 E-Mail: [email protected] WWW: http://www.aei.mpg.de/~hewitson ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
