On Sep 13, 2011, at 11:36 AM, Scott Ribe wrote: > Yeah, but about the only thing you can do in that forked process is exec a > new image over it. This is not a technique for memory sharing.
That’s true in the general case on OS X, but my understanding is that as long as you stick to POSIX APIs you can do actual work in the forked process. As I said before, it’s Mach ports that get messed up in the fork. I’m not an expert on this, though. —Jens_______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
