On Feb 25, 2012, at 8:23 AM, Kyle Sluder wrote: > And then show how that jives with footnote 56, which says that the intent of > the standard is that null pointers become whatever integer is most similar to > the bit pattern used for null pointers, which may or may not be the same as > that used for integer zero depending on the platform.
Hmm. So Harbison & Steele (5th Edition) is wrong??? That's a surprise to me. -- Scott Ribe scott_r...@elevated-dev.com http://www.elevated-dev.com/ (303) 722-0567 voice _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com