On Feb 25, 2012, at 8:23 AM, Kyle Sluder wrote:

> And then show how that jives with footnote 56, which says that the intent of 
> the standard is that null pointers become whatever integer is most similar to 
> the bit pattern used for null pointers, which may or may not be the same as 
> that used for integer zero depending on the platform.

Hmm. So Harbison & Steele (5th Edition) is wrong??? That's a surprise to me.

-- 
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice





_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to