On 13 Aug 2012, at 20:40, Greg Parker <gpar...@apple.com> wrote: > On Aug 11, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Jayson Adams <jay...@circusponies.com> wrote: >> Poor reading skills are keeping this thread alive. No, I have not been >> saying anything related to whatever work I may or may not have that's >> related to 64-bit porting. What I have been ranting and raving about is the >> fact that the 64-bit porting guide currently states that you may not want to >> move to 64-bit. That is the official advice any straggler developer will >> see right at this moment when they consult that document. If Apple decides >> to just up-and-drop 32-bit support, anyone relying on this official bit of >> Apple documentation, as it currently stands, between now and then will be >> screwed. If Apple is considering dropping 32-bit support they need to >> change this piece of documentation. > > You're right, that documentation is out of date with respect to our current > recommendations. You should file a bug report for the benefit of any > straggler developers out there. > > >> And no, I am not going to file a bug on it. > > Oh.
I used the feedback link at the bottom of the page. Is there any appreciable difference between the two? In the past my documentation radars seem to have gone mostly ignored. _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
