On Sep 10, 2012, at 19:27 , Charles Srstka <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sep 10, 2012, at 9:23 PM, Quincey Morris > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It doesn't need "all the extra scaffolding". KVC will peer quite happily >> into your instance variables by default. What you don't get for free, in >> that case, is KVO compliance for the property. The purpose of providing >> explicit accessors is therefore twofold: >> >> 1. It avoids letting KVC introspect your ivars, which is a horrible hack. >> >> 2. It gives you automatic KVO compliance. > > With that said, writing these accessors *is* rather mechanical and > repetitive, and it would be nice if @synthesize could create the appropriate > accessors in this case. I think the reason I keep screwing this up is because intuitively, it should just work (perhaps with lower performance, and only for the "obvious" pattern). -- Rick _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
