On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Koen van der Drift
<[email protected]> wrote:
Good point, thanks. So are there any workarounds for that? I'm sure
> this pattern (doing lots of calculations concurrently, and store the
> results in a common object for later), is used in other situations as
> well.
>From a quick search, would this work in my situation (will try later):
@synchronized(temp) {
[temp addObject: newObj];
}
Thanks,
- Koen.
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [email protected]