On Nov 26, 2012, at 6:30 PM, Kyle Sluder wrote: > On Nov 26, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Matt Neuburg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> PS Is there any merit to my suggestion that the runtime should warn if you >> set the frame of a constrained interface object? I really think such a >> warning would save a lot of programmers from shooting themselves in the >> foot. It is so easy to switch to auto layout and think you've got everything >> worked out, but accidentally leave explicit frame changes from your old >> code. And you don't discover this until layout is triggered, which could be >> a long time later…! Stop me from submitting this as a suggestion to the bug >> reporter if it's a dumb idea. > > Do it. If I refrained from filing every enhancement request that Apple might > not grant, I'd have far fewer than 150 open Radars.
Gosh, I've only got 37 open radars. Clearly I am not spending my time uselessly enough! I need to file more bugs so that Apple can do nothing whatever about them. :)) (Do radars that they close off as duplicates count? I've got lots of those that they haven't fixed either.) m. -- matt neuburg, phd = [email protected], http://www.apeth.net/matt/ pantes anthropoi tou eidenai oregontai phusei Programming iOS 5! http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920023562.do RubyFrontier! http://www.apeth.com/RubyFrontierDocs/default.html TidBITS, Mac news and reviews since 1990, http://www.tidbits.com _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
