On 10 Nov 2012, at 18:28, Sean McBride wrote: > On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:09:58 +0000, Luke Hiesterman said: > >> File wrappers don't make it inherently easier or harder to deal with >> iCloud. File packages (which you would use file wrappers to represent) >> can be elegant means of wrapping up document data because it allows for >> easy separation of distinct components, and are usually recommended if >> they at all make sense for your application. > > Unless you use NSPersistentDocument, which still, after all these years, and > even after the addition of 'external storage' support in 10.7, doesn't > support file wrappers. :(
It’s worth noting that the docs explicitly say NSPersistentDocument doesn’t support iCloud either. http://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/General/Conceptual/iCloudDesignGuide/Chapters/DesignForCoreDataIniCloud.html As I understand it (and I may be utterly wrong), if you want Core Data based iCloud documents on OS X, you’re in the same boat as everyone else working with NSDocument directly. i.e. no special syncing or conflict resolution. _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
