On Jan 14, 2013, at 16:03, William Sumner <prestonsum...@me.com> wrote:

> On Jan 14, 2013, at 4:45 PM, Charles Srstka <cocoa...@charlessoft.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Jan 14, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Kyle Sluder <k...@ksluder.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Given that Gordon's explicit use case involves one part of his app
>>> setting up timers that point at objects in other parts of his app that
>>> know nothing of the timers' existence, this sounds like a fragility
>>> nightmare.
>>> 
>>> The NSTimer ship has sailed.
>> 
>> I don't really see it. All you'd need would be a special initializer or 
>> convenience constructor, like +[NSMapTable strongToWeakObjectsMapTable]. 
>> Make versions of the +timerWithTimeInterval:etc:etc: classes which would 
>> cause the created NSTimer to weakly retain its target, and it'd just work. 
> 
> 
> I'm still holding out hope for @doWhatIWant. Stop being so lazy, Apple.

I dont' think Apple engineers are lazy. They are probably extremely busy and 
have to prioritize. Of course, they could hire more people but throwing more 
people at a project is not always a guarantee of more work done...

-Laurent.
-- 
Laurent Daudelin
AIM/iChat/Skype:LaurentDaudelin                                 
http://www.nemesys-soft.com/
Logiciels Nemesys Software                                      
laur...@nemesys-soft.com


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to