On 16 Oct 2014, at 10:07 pm, Graham Cox <graham....@bigpond.com> wrote: > > maybe somone can spot an issue with the UTI export?
Just a guess -- the docs say: > When specifying conformance for your UTI, your items should ideally conform > to both a physical and functional hierarchy. That is, the conformance should > specify both its physical nature (a directory, a file, and so on) as well as > its usage (an image, a movie, and so on). > > • A UTI in the physical hierarchy should conform through the > inheritance hierarchy to public.item. > • A UTI in a functional hierarchy should conform through inheritance to > a base UTI that is not public.item. For example, public.content, > public.executable and public.archive are all examples of functional base > UTIs. > While conforming to the functional hierarchy is not mandatory That last sentence could be read as implying that conforming to a physical hierarchy is mandatory, and you're not doing that. So maybe you also need to conform to something like public.item or public.data. -- Shane Stanley <sstan...@myriad-com.com.au> <www.macosxautomation.com/applescript/apps/> _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
